Storyboard Instructions

The Practice Experience Project Storyboard is a brief, visual summary of a completed quality improvement initiative. The storyboard highlights key aspects of a quality improvement effort by documenting the Practice Experience Project from beginning to end.

The course template uses a PowerPoint format to complete this assignment. You only need to provide two slides, no more. The first slide is the summary of your project; the second slide is the reference page. You will need to choose the most pertinent information from your practice experience and Capstone Paper to complete the Storyboard. No voiceover is required.

The completed storyboard is submitted for grading. Optional: You may submit your storyboard to the group discussion area and share your presentation with your classmates and instructor.

iT MUST GO IN STORYBOOK TEMPLATE ATTACHED

COMPLETED PAPERS ATTACHED TO PLACE IN TEMPLATE

RUBRIC:
Briefly paraphrases and summarizes:
Quality Improvement problem   
18 (12%) – 20 (13.33%)
Student provided a fully developed quality improvement problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (10.67%) – 17 (11.33%)
Student provided a developed quality improvement problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%)
Student provided a minimally-developed quality improvement problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 13 (8.67%)
Student provided a under-developed quality improvement problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Data to support the problem   
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
Student provided a fully developed discussion of data used to support the problem with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
23 (15.33%) – 26 (17.33%)
Student provided a developed discussion of data used to support the problem with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
22 (14.67%) – 25 (16.67%)
Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of data used to support the problem with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 21 (14%)
Student provided a under-developed discussion of data used to support the problem with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Evidence   
27 (18%) – 30 (20%)
Student provided a fully developed analysis of the available evidence with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
23 (15.33%) – 26 (17.33%)
Student provided a developed analysis of the evidence with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
22 (14.67%) – 25 (16.67%)
Student provided a minimally-developed analysis of the evidence with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 21 (14%)
Student provided a under-developed analysis of the evidence with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
QI Plan   
35 (23.33%) – 40 (26.67%)
Student provided a fully developed Quality Improvement plan with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
30 (20%) – 34 (22.67%)
Student provided a developed Quality Improvement Plan with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
25 (16.67%) – 29 (19.33%)
Student provided a minimally-developed Quality Improvement Plan with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 24 (16%)
Student provided a under-developed Quality Improvement Plan with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
Resources   
18 (12%) – 20 (13.33%)
Student provided a fully developed use of resources with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (10.67%) – 17 (11.33%)
Student provided a developed use of resources with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (9.33%) – 15 (10%)
Student provided a minimally-developed use of resources with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
0 (0%) – 13 (8.67%)
Student provided a under-developed use of resources with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.
References included on last slide.

A minimum of five references are required.   
9 (6%) – 10 (6.67%)
Student provided a fully developed list of references with using accurate APA format.
8 (5.33%) – 8 (5.33%)
Student provided a developed list of references with minimal APA formatting errors.
7 (4.67%) – 7 (4.67%)
Student provided a minimally-developed list of references with several APA formatting errors.
0 (0%) – 6 (4%)
Student provided a under-developed list of references with no use of APA format.
Total Points: 150