Culture and Organisation

Order Description

This is the question How did virgin became a learning organization in the UK.
You would choose one theoretical framework and that is number 2 in the brief which the (a particular organizational practice (something the organization does)) You need to see if either hafsted or schien theories is the theory that you would apply on virgin group as a learning organization. If it was schien, use the three levels of schien and culture elements. If it was hafsted, use the hafsted dimension and you need to use this website to find the dimension of the country https://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html

Example of table of content:

1.0 Background of the virgin group

2.0 The focus of the report

? Why interest contemplates across culture

2.1 Amvried Culture frame work

3.0 Choosing an appropriate framework
? Proposed by hafsted globe or schien globe

1 credibility

2 most applicable to this case

? For example, if schien were chosen, why was it chosen and the same would go for hafsted if chosen.

4.0 Hofsted or schien central concepts

4.1 Reason supporting choosing hafsted or schien

4.2 Similar case studies

? In this point, I want the support of using the hafsted or schien framework in virgin in another country other than the UK.

5.0 The chart of dimension of either schien or hafsted

5.1 Power distance
? How did virgin embed being a learning organization in the uk

5.2 Individualism vs collectivism
? How did virgin embed being a learning organization in the uk

5.3 Masculinity vs. femininity
? How did virgin embed being a learning organization in the uk

5.4 Long term orientation
? How did virgin embed being a learning organization in the uk

6.0 Conclusion
? It should have recommendations

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *